Human Editors vs. AI: Why the Best Strategy Isn’t What You Think

artificial intelligence

If you’re like most freelance editors I know, you’ve probably had at least one panic spiral about AI. You know the one: Scrolling through LinkedIn, seeing yet another post about ChatGPT’s latest update, wondering if your red pen is about to become as obsolete as a floppy disk.

I get it—the anxiety is real. But the conversation most editors are having oversimplifies what’s actually happening.

The Great AI Freakout

I’ve been watching this unfold since 2022, when ChatGPT first launched to the public. Editors split into two camps faster than you could say “grammar check.”

Camp One is the “AI is evil” crowd. They’re posting angry and/or fearful rants about how large language models (LLMs) are taking their jobs, how AI slop is infiltrating every aspect of our lives, and how clients are being fooled by shiny tech.

Camp Two has gone full AI cheerleader. They’re using every language model under the sun, posting screenshots of their best prompts and “productivity gains,” and acting like human editors are dinosaurs waiting for the meteor.

Both camps are missing something huge.

Why This Isn’t Actually About Choosing Sides

The editors who are crushing it right now aren’t picking Team Human or Team LLM. They’re building something entirely different.

Think about it this way: When spell check came along, did the best editors throw their computers out the window? Nope. They started using spell check to handle the basic stuff so they could focus on bigger problems. The same thing happened with Track Changes, with Editor’s Toolkit Plus, with PerfectIt, with every tool that made editing faster.

The editors who are thriving at the moment aren't asking, “Should I use AI or not?” They’re asking, "What’s the most valuable work I can do that no algorithm can replicate?”

The Two Paths That Actually Work

After talking to more than fifty editors who’ve figured this out, I see two distinct approaches working.

The Specialist Route

These editors took a hard look at what AI actually can and can’t do, then decided to position themselves as the antidote to algorithmic mediocrity. They’ve gone all-in on becoming irreplaceably human—the editors who do the deep thinking, nuanced judgment, and strategic work that no pattern-matching system can replicate.

These aren’t editors who are afraid of technology. They’re strategic about understanding AI’s fundamental limitations: It can’t access current (paywalled) style guides, strips out formatting, converts everything to numbers without understanding meaning, and confidently hallucinates information that sounds plausible but isn’t accurate. So they’ve positioned themselves as the premium alternative for clients who need precision, accountability, and genuine expertise.

One editor I know specialized in editing content for financial advisory firms—client newsletters, regulatory compliance documents, and educational materials. She learned the complex regulations around financial communications, understands the difference between general market commentary and investment advice, and knows which disclaimers are required for different types of content. She charges $175/hour because when financial advisors face potential regulatory scrutiny, they need an editor who understands both clear communication and legal compliance—not a tool that might confidently suggest changes that could create liability issues.

A fiction editor I know went deep into developmental editing for romance authors. She understands genre conventions, can spot pacing issues that kill momentum, and knows how to help authors strengthen character arcs and emotional beats. She commands premium rates for developmental editing because romance authors who want to build sustainable careers need an editor who understands both the craft and the market—not a tool that offers generic praise where honest critiques (and solutions) are needed and confidently suggests plot changes that violate reader expectations and weaken character development.

The Strategic Partner Route

These editors embrace AI as their business assistant for tasks it actually does well—the stuff that doesn’t require precision but benefits from brainstorming and exploration. They’ll use AI to help clarify what a confusing sentence is trying to say, brainstorm different heading options, break down complex concepts they need to understand before editing, or translate industry jargon into plain English.

But here’s where it gets strategic: They’re using AI as their virtual business assistant. Creating professional editorial letter templates, developing client intake forms, writing email templates for common situations, and building marketing copy for their services—the kind of administrative work that’s important but doesn’t require their high-level editorial expertise.

The most successful freelance copyeditors at the moment are discovering that AI excels at creating custom Word macros and wildcard searches that automate repetitive editing tasks. Instead of manually hunting for formatting inconsistencies across 300-page manuscripts, for example, they have AI write macros that find and fix them in seconds. They also use it to understand complex technical concepts before editing scientific papers and other specialized content, so they can ask better questions and make smarter editorial decisions.

Professional editors would never trust AI to actually copyedit their manuscripts—they know it can’t handle long documents effectively due to context window limitations, will confidently fabricate citations and publication details that don’t exist, and tends to make unnecessary changes even when specifically instructed to leave certain sections alone. Instead, they use it strategically for the tasks it handles well, then apply their human expertise where precision and accountability matter.

What Both Paths Have in Common

Whether you go specialist or strategic partner, you’re solving the same core problem: Delivering value that no algorithm can replicate.

The specialists are diving deeper into expertise that requires years of human experience and staying current on constantly evolving standards. The strategic partners are using their editorial judgment to make the decisions AI can’t—what tone serves this audience best, what information should be emphasized, and how this content fits into the bigger picture.

Both approaches require you to level up your game. Both mean charging more, not less. And both mean being crystal clear about the irreplaceable human value you bring to every project.

When clients understand that you’re not just fixing typos, but ensuring their content achieves its actual purpose—that’s when your rates start reflecting your real worth.

The Real Question You Should Be Asking

Instead of “How do I compete with AI?” try asking, “What can I create that’s impossible without me?”

Maybe it’s understanding the cultural nuances that make marketing copy work in different regions. Maybe it’s knowing how to edit technical content so it’s both accurate and accessible. Maybe it’s having the strategic perspective to help clients align their content with business goals.

The editors who are panicking are the ones treating editing like a commodity service—think of it as the “fix my grammar and send it back” approach. They’re positioning themselves as interchangeable word-fixers who compete primarily on speed and price. When your main selling point is “I can proofread faster than that other editor,” you’re basically asking clients to see you as a human spell-checker.

Here’s the problem with commodity thinking: Commodities get replaced by cheaper alternatives. If your value proposition is “I find typos quickly,” then yes, you’re going to lose sleep over every new AI tool that promises to do the same thing for free.

But the editors who are thriving? They understand that great editing has always been about insight, judgment, and strategic thinking—skills that get more valuable, not less, in an AI world. They’re not selling grammar fixes; they’re selling outcomes. They’re the editors who say, “I help pharmaceutical companies get FDA approval faster,” or “I make sure your technical documentation helps users solve real problems,” or “I ensure that your content aligns with your brand strategy and resonates with your target audience.”

When you position yourself as the person who delivers specific, measurable results that matter to your clients’ success, you’re no longer a commodity. You’re an asset. And assets don’t get replaced by algorithms—they use algorithms to become even more valuable.

Your Homework

Take fifteen minutes right now and answer this: What’s the most valuable thing you do for clients that goes beyond fixing their grammar or cleaning up their prose?

Is it helping them clarify their message? Making their content more persuasive? Ensuring it aligns with their brand voice? Understanding their audience better than they do? Helping them develop compelling characters that will grab a literary agent’s attention?

Whatever that thing is—that’s your future. That’s what you double down on while AI handles the stuff you never loved doing anyway.

The best strategy isn’t about choosing between human and AI. It’s about choosing to become irreplaceable.

Further AI Resources for Editors

Are You Charging What You're Worth?

New to editorial freelancing and feeling like you need to learn all the things? Overwhelmed with projects but not making enough money? Forgoing breaks and vacation time to meet deadlines? My free, 9-lesson course gives you actionable ways to find your ideal freelance rates, say goodbye to the hustle, and build a profitable business that energizes you.